The 83-year-old British illustrator said he doesn’t understand the enthusiasm for “crypto art,” particularly the digital collages of American Beeple, which took home $69.3 million in March.
“silly little things“.Contrary to the frenzy surrounding NFTs and the rise of digital art since the beginning of the year, David Hockney doesn’t seem convinced by what some are already calling it.”A new chapter in art historyDepuis sa paisible retraite normande, le peintre britannique vivant le plus cher du monde a ausculté le collage numérique de l’américain Beeple, adjugé pour 69.3 millions de dollars en mars, et avoué ne pas comprendre sus par cit l’ artwork: “I saw the pictures. It was…just silly little things, really. I did not understand what it was.»
See also – Record sale of $69.3 million for a digital work by artist Beeple
With Jeff Koons, the British painter is one of two living artists not to be outdone by Beeple, who have just propelled them to third place among the world’s most expensive current artists during the massive sale of their work. Every day: the first 5,000 days . A true earthquake in the art world, 100% virtual work standard sale, authentically certified by NFT (non-fungible token, “Non-replaceable code”) Unique, attracting David Hockney’s attention, but without convincing. According to him, the NFT ecosystem will not be less than “International Association of Scammers and ScammersHe said during a taped interview on the Waldy & Bendy’s Adventures in Art podcast. In an interview with the English art critic Valdemar Janushak, the painter admitted that he did not really understand what he was about. “I don’t know … I read about them, but I’m not very interested. To me, it’s just a scamHe said in a cheerful tone.
Physical art vs virtual art
Based on tamper-resistant blockchain technology (blockchain NFTs act as global digital certificates of authenticity installed alongside the most diverse elements: clip, image, text, music. In the burgeoning context of cryptocurrency and speculation, this market, which was initially focused on collectibles, has invested in recent months in the field of contemporary art and the role of Auctions and even fairs. However, their technical operating principle, based on the cryptocurrency system, as well as the basic digital nature of the currency and the things being exchanged, can confuse more than one, like 83-year-old David Hockney.”Not understand. What do they buy? I just do not knowasked the painter.
Although he himself did not convert to NFTs, like other major figures in contemporary art such as Damien Hirst, David Hockney had long been interested in new technologies that he enjoyed experimenting with, such as his work on faxes in the 1980s. In recent years, he’s also been streaming into digital art through his iPad. But if the tablet joined the artist’s canvas, then the works thus created are only in his eyes at the moment of their printing, indicating their entry into the real world. “We print it, because we have to print it“, supporting the artist, who clearly digital art only makes sense in the service of physical production, not virtual.”Things get lost in IT, right? They will get lost at some point, even in the cloud. There will be many. How will you find them?asked David Hockney.
This observation of the inescapable materialism of art was ridiculed by Beeple himself. In response to David Hockney’s comments on the necessity of digital art print, the 39-year-old American artist sided with humor by writing on Twitter on Sunday: “Guys, I want to get really legit, looking for recommendations for my printer. My budget is $69 million.»
Despite his skepticism about NFTs, David Hockney remains optimistic and confident about the future. The millionaire painter turned to the hymns of nature and the Norman spring, no longer looking for any other light than the sunlight that hits the verdant Calvados countryside. “I’m 83, I don’t really want to travel anymore, I’m fine hereThe painter said. I have no visitors, it’s cool. . solitude leads to creativity, separate from the brilliance of hypothetical art, which he had previously sung in his open letter to France, only a year earlier: “My life suits me, and I have one thing to do: paint.»